Border Security extends SESMA with a register of watch sites, cameras and radars, and an engine that shows what each sensor can actually see through terrain, haze and clutter. Find the gaps, test the next tower before it is built, and map where a target could go — on one map, with one audit trail.
Explore at resonixtech.com →Which stretch of border is not watched at all? If this tower fails, what do we lose? Where should the next three towers go, and what do they add? If someone is seen here, which sensors see them, and where can they get to in the next twenty minutes? Each question is answered on the same map, from the same register, and every answer can be exported as a report.
Every result is computed from terrain elevation, earth curvature, refraction, land cover and weather, never drawn by hand. Ranges are datasheet figures scaled by a realism factor, models stay flagged unverified until tested in the field, and every route is a candidate route, not a prediction. Outputs that reveal where the border is not watched sit behind a separate analyst role.
Border Security is a module of SESMA: same deployment, same sign-in, same audit trail.
Sites carry cameras and radars, each with boresight, sector, tilt and status (planned, commissioned, decommissioned). CSV import with dry-run preview and export, and a change log that records who changed what, when, before and after.
Tick any combination of sensors and see their coverage at once: best level, radar and camera together, overlap, or which sensor sees each cell best. Per-sensor results are cached, so a new selection redraws in a moment.
Terrain elevation, earth curvature and refraction, mast and target height, sensor sector, tilt and minimum range, plus land-cover clutter that lifts the ground: a built-up block or an orchard hides what lies behind it.
Nine editable scenarios from clear to thick fog, rain and dust storm. Visible and thermal channels degrade by their own physics, and cameras can be run by day, by night or best of both.
Drop a what-if target, or open a real one, and drag it. For every sensor you get the level reached, distance and bearing, or the reason it fails: terrain, sector or range. Sight lines are drawn green or red on the map.
Propose new towers or take existing ones out in a scenario that never touches the register. Compare baseline against proposal with a delta map and a gain table, then let an administrator promote what is accepted.
Ask where the next N towers should go. The engine scans candidate locations and terrain high points, picks the sites with the greatest added coverage, and re-checks each choice sensor by sensor before it is reported.
From any target or map point: isochrones for how far it can be by now, diverse candidate routes with ETA and slope, a corridor of near-best alternatives, the sensors along each route, and interception points for responders.
For analysts: percentage of the border covered at each level, the list of gaps with lengths, a dead-ground map and each site's unique contribution. Every output is watermarked and exports to CSV or KML.
The module opens on its own room, separate from the spectrum Mission Room and open only to Border Security holders. Layers organise the picture: vectors (border lines, barriers, tracks), heat-maps, targets and watch sites. The status bar counts what is on the map, and everything a user draws or places stays inside this room.
The register is the single list of what is built, planned or retired. Each row is a site; open it to see its cameras and radars. Everyone with the module can read it, administrators edit it, and every edit leaves a trail, so a coverage figure can always be traced back to the configuration it was computed from.
Coverage is not run per study. Each sensor's result is computed once and cached; whatever you tick is composed on the fly. The tree holds the sites, the three controls below decide what you see.
Teal ground is seen at the chosen level, red ground is not. Each sensor's view is a radial sweep over the elevation model, with the earth's curvature and refraction applied, so a ridge casts a real shadow and a near blind zone appears under a down-looking camera. Switch the backdrop and the same result reads against imagery, terrain or land cover.
A coverage figure means nothing without its conditions. The dialog sets them in one place, and every cached grid is stored against that exact set, so two analysts asking the same question get the same answer instantly.
Each scenario is a meteorological optical range, plus an optional rain rate and a hot-day flag: from clear at 20 km, through haze, dust and fog, down to thick fog at 120 m. Weather caps every level at the same distance, so Detect, which reaches furthest, is the first to shrink.
Terrain is the main obstacle; clutter is what stands on it. A 10 m land-cover raster and an editable class-to-height table lift the ground along every line of sight, so a town or a plantation hides what lies behind it. Roads and tracks are burned in from OpenStreetMap so a narrow road does not become a false wall.
Click two points on the map, or snap to a site, and the profile appears: ground, curvature, the straight line of sight, the closest approach and a plain verdict. In the example the sight line is blocked by clutter standing 15 m on the ground, 10 m above the line of sight.
The register holds what is real or approved. A scenario is a named what-if workspace on top of it: proposed sites, or changes to existing ones, such as taking a tower out to see what its failure costs. Proposals are drawn as ghosts with a P badge, so they are never mistaken for built equipment.
Draw the area to search and the area, or border line, to cover. Choose the kit, how many sites, and what counts as covered. The dialog shows the size of the problem before it starts: candidates, objective cells, the reach of the kit and an estimated run time.
The search scores a grid of candidates plus the high points of the terrain, then picks sites one at a time by the coverage each adds. The shortlist is recomputed sensor by sensor at 20–45 m, and the chosen sites are checked again at full resolution; a difference above 15 % from the estimate is called out in the result.
A cost-distance run over the terrain, where speed depends on the slope in the direction of travel: uphill is not downhill. Choose a mobility profile and the dialog fills in its limits; override them for the run. Candidate routes, not predictions: people do not walk pure least-cost paths, and the report says so.
Colour bands show how far the target can have travelled in five, ten, twenty, thirty and more minutes, and the band for the time since the sighting is highlighted. Each route reports its time, length, steepest and average slope, and how much of it runs on roads, tracks or slow cover.
Up to k routes per destination are drawn with time ticks, made diverse by penalising ground an earlier route already used. Beneath them, a corridor shows every cell within a chosen percentage of the best total time, a more honest picture than one line. Wherever the cursor rests, a chip gives the ETA, distance, slope and movement class.
An escape-route run or a scenario becomes a PDF with the marking you choose printed on every page. The report opens with the bottom line (time to the border, time to vanish at a road or settlement, earliest warning, interception feasibility), then the figures, every route with a waypoint table in latitude and longitude and in UTM, the method, the data and its limits.
Fixed or PTZ, with field of view, pan and tilt limits, and separate day and night channels (illuminator, laser or thermal), each with Detect, Recognise and Identify ranges. A calculator derives ranges from pixel density using IEC 62676-4 (2014 or 2025) or Johnson criteria for thermal, and a realism factor tempers datasheet figures that field tests rarely reach.
Rotating, electronically scanned or hybrid, with sectors, tilt, beamwidth and minimum range. Ranges are given per target class (person, vehicle, small UAS, boat); a class the datasheet omits is scaled from another by radar cross-section, and flagged as scaled. Several panels on one mast are simply several sensors.
Boresight from true north, mechanical tilt, and horizontal and vertical sectors relative to both. Windows wrap through north correctly, rotating heads cover 360°, and the vertical test creates the near blind zone under a down-looking camera or a tilted radar face.
Site types and sensor types set marker and fan colours and glyphs. Status is held on both site and sensor, and the lower of the two applies, so a planned camera can sit on a commissioned tower. Kits of sensors are saved as site templates and placed as a whole.
Open the Border Security room and its own targets. Run coverage, overlap and best-sensor views; place a target and see who sees it; build scenarios and run site search; run fastest and shortest escape routes, isochrones and interception.
The only role that edits the register. Creates and edits sites, sensors, models, types, templates, weather scenarios and mobility profiles; imports and exports CSV; promotes accepted proposals into the register.
Granted on top of the operator role. Border-line reports, gap lists, dead-ground maps, unique contribution, the stealthiest escape route and route exposure figures. Every output is watermarked RESTRICTED.